Global Firepower – 2013 World Military Strength Ranking

Global Firepower - 2013 World Military Strength Ranking Global Firepower – 2013 World Military Strength Ranking (Data & Facts) Global Firepo…
Video Rating: 2 / 5

This entry was posted in Ranking and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to Global Firepower – 2013 World Military Strength Ranking

  1. Duane Burnette says:

    What’s up with the music? Sounds like a porn movie from the 70s! Boom chickee wah wah!

  2. Progamess says:

    Fuck you global firepower sucks they dont even know of the Nethelands but the Nethelands is by very much people chosen to be number 10 in europe!

  3. Johnny bizaro says:

    what B.S., waste of time

  4. ianic pn says:


  5. Charles Harris says:

    There are currently No other military forces on earth, either singularly or jointly, that can oppose the US Military on a field of battle. Our land forces are the best trained and equipped, our Navy has no peer, and our technology is overwhelming. Fighting an insurgent action is one thing..flat out annihilation is another!

  6. fat fux says:

    yeah, it’s all aout playing your cards right, i can get behind that.

  7. Tony Horner says:

    The numbers really don’t give a true picture of the state of a nations military strength. Technology, training, balance of capabilities, clearly defined objectives and the political will to support the military are just as important as how many tanks, planes, warships and soldiers you have. 

  8. weeguy says:

    this is all shit because you can’t believe just one site,you have to do alot of research from books to internet on every country,and you have to do it yourself FACT

  9. Jyotirmoy Sarkar says:

    This info is not up to date.

  10. Massy Biagio says:

    700 BLN $ Usa spent for Defense every year. THIS IS INSANE

  11. wingedlightning says:

    Very well researched great video!

  12. EKon235 says:

    WOW! Every comment I see in these types of videos has people just…shitting on Russyia. Europeans are REALLY frightened of them. The country’s not interested in a fight a with your asses. They’ve beaten your ass plenty of times in the past, but you’re always asking for a rematch. Now you’ve all pulled your resources together to give it a one last go of it…to conquer it. One politician (they called them ‘statesman’ then) actually once said: “It is fundamentally unfair for one country to possess resources of such enormity”. You’d be surprised. This is why they’re always goading them to take the bait by closing in on their territory. Forget it! What Russia has isn’t leaving her hands, neither to you nor to the Chinese. You’d be wise to follow their example and relish what you have now instead of marching towards doom…where nothing of worth fighting for is left. Selfish trash. Can never have enough! This is the fucked up part of capitalist ‘values’. Pathetic. Anyway, Like the beats, bro. 

  13. OperatorV 1.0 says:

    One more thing…Any stats on NBC?

  14. jon sam says:

    damn U.S.A. Hell yah king of Air still means no one can beat them.

  15. Music Guru says:

    Turkey will shit on all of you 😉

  16. darkwolf gian says:

    why you tell bullshits russia have 100aircraft carriers 200 destroyers and 267 crusiers who tell you this bullshits?

  17. Matt Beechey says:

    That depends if the UK played defensively, the US hasn’t had real war experience against a first world country in a long time. This can’t be said for the UK. If the RAF waited at the UK and allowed the US to send carrier fleets then they could have the opportunity to sink a few carriers, costing thousands of US lives and billions of dollars, it would be a brutal, bloody war – but if it was an open field war, all cards on the table in an open area, the US would stomp the UK.

  18. toolmantooltime says:

    wolf guy lay off the drugs. You know call it dope for a reason right? Anyway russian navy is small and that cant be hidden with their budget

  19. FOertel says:

    And the US is? Guy, you cant afford a half new war, US is near collapse and cant afford a new war against anyone xD

  20. ythramoj osilbar says:

    hahaha viva phillipines wooooooooo

  21. Luke Isom says:

    I know the UK is America’s best ally, but if we were to go war against ya’ll. It would not be a contest at all… it would a beatdown. I think the only country that could challenge us would be China. Russia too, but their not financially capable of sustaining a war right now.

  22. toolmantooltime says:

    huh? The battle of Britain? That was well over 70 years ago ya know? What does have to do with current capabilities?

  23. josh sedge says:

    says somthing about the raf’s skill over the usaf doesn’t it ? i mean we did fight the battle brittain before you arived the biggest air battle 2 date

Leave a Reply