Brainboost semantics of natural language By / December 14, 2012 comment Video Rating: 4 / 5 You may also like Human as a Second Language: Succeeding with the Natural Language Toolkit By AlleenNewton744 / June 18, 2013 Reader's View: Understanding the teen brain By yyhglppluh / May 30, 2013 Speed Copywriting Workshop Set to Maximize Learning Using Innovative Mind-Boosting Technique By Inosseadose1977 / April 27, 2013 OpenAmplify’s New Version 3.0 API Boosts Sentiment Analysis with a Signal that Answers “Why” By alexasami1a1 / April 11, 2013 Tim Lapthorn – Bemsha Swing By / April 9, 2013 Post navigation Intro to Digital Photography Part IIКАНИКУЛЫ БОНИФАЦИЯ (http://serp-i-molot.com.ua) 5 thoughts on “semantics of natural language” HAHAHAHHAH dude u r funny!!! Log in to Reply very good and insightful comments. genius! Log in to Reply Thanks for your advice Randy. I will look out for the book. Log in to Reply (cont) For example, SHRLU was written in planner (a programming language implemented in LISP) and today planner is recognized as being a dialect of prolog. Do check out the recent book by Patrick Blackburn and Johan Bos for a great description of how to implement the state-of-the-art semantics in prolog. Log in to Reply Prolog is the preferred programming language for NLP semantics. The principle problem with prolog can be enunciated this way: They say that a good programming language should make hard problems easy and easy problems trivial. Prolog makes hard problems easy, but makes easy problems hard 🙂 That being said, if you want to do NLP semantics, you’ll eventually have to implement most of what is already in prolog. (cont) Log in to Reply Leave a Reply Cancel replyYou must be logged in to post a comment.